Sure maybe, but if Osaka gets to 20 slams then Margaret Court comes
into the conversation as the ultimate goal. Serena would not have
been playing last few yrs if she had 25 slams.
You are completely deluded if you think people will stop
talking about Serena after she retires.
But what can we say about her if she holds no records?
Even YOU, Whisper, are talking about her right now!
Yes, because she's an active player and is close to claiming the all
time slam record. If she retires with 23 slams I don't see how I will
feel the need to post anything about her? I mean what is there to say?
you'll continue to mention her (even against your own will!) for the
next 15-20 years!
Only against fanboys who can't count. Less is not more.
You might as well admit she's one of the greatest female tennis
players who ever picked up a racket! That's a FACT.
Absolutely. The players we talk most about are the slam record holders.
ie the best Wim, USO, FO, AO champs etc. Serena is not in any of those
categories. That's why she's hellbent on winning 25. Nobody can ignore
the all time record holder - Serena knows this better than anybody, as
do Fed, Rafa & Djoker. That's why Margaret Court is always mentioned.
If she had 21 slams how often do you think she'd be mentioned in rst?
Less than Moody.