Discussion:
Pelle flip-flops again and now 100% agrees about Navalny with skrip!!
(too old to reply)
The Iceberg
2021-02-25 21:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Turns out he made some mean comments over 15 years ago, so Pelle and co have totally abandoned Navalny now! Pelle and co totally agree with what skrip has said all along about him! they prob want him to be locked up by Putin for 5000 years with hard labour! LOL

https://summit.news/2021/02/25/amnesty-strips-russian-dissident-of-prisoner-of-conscience-status-after-he-was-accused-of-being-racist-15-years-ago/

Amnesty Strips Russian Dissident of “Prisoner of Conscience” Status After He Was Accused of Being Racist 15 Years Ago

Aleksei Navalny cancelled over “xenophobic comments.”

Russian dissident politician Aleksei Navalny, who was almost killed in a nerve agent attack last year, has been stripped of his “prisoner of conscience” status by Amnesty International after 15-year-old racist comments were brought to light.

Yes, really.

Navalny is currently serving a prison sentence which many assert is punishment for him exposing the corruption of the Russian elite and organizing anti-Vladimir Putin demonstrations.

In August 2020, Navalny was hospitalized after being poisoned with a nerve agent, an attack he blamed on Putin and agents of the Federal Security Service (FSB).

But none of that matters now because Navalny said some mean words 15 years ago.

Despite admitting that the complaints made against Navalny were part of an orchestrated campaign to discredit him, Amnesty International announced that they were stripping Navalny of the “prisoner of conscience” designation anyway.

“We had too many requests; we couldn’t ignore them,” Amnesty spokesman Alexander Artemev told the BBC, despite noting that the issue was “not relevant” in the light of his current political persecution.

“He cannot be a prisoner of conscience: that is someone who never advocates hate or violence or uses hate speech,” Amnesty International added.

Navalny allegedly called for the removal of “everything that bothers us” while referring to immigrants and labeled them “cockroaches,” making him a “white supremacist” according to the complaints.

Apparently, being caught uttering racist statements a decade and a half ago means many on the left will now abandon Navalny and leave him to rot in a Russian jail.

Despite Navalny taking on what many assert to be one of the most dangerously dictatorial regimes in the world, the fact that the Russian dissident allowed some offensive sounds to emerge from his mouth 15 years ago has now sealed his fate.
*skriptis
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Turns out he made some mean comments over 15 years ago, so Pelle and co have totally abandoned Navalny now! Pelle and co totally agree with what skrip has said all along about him! they prob want him to be locked up by Putin for 5000 years with hard labour! LOLhttps://summit.news/2021/02/25/amnesty-strips-russian-dissident-of-prisoner-of-conscience-status-after-he-was-accused-of-being-racist-15-years-ago/Amnesty Strips Russian Dissident of “Prisoner of Conscience” Status After He Was Accused of Being Racist 15 Years AgoAleksei Navalny cancelled over “xenophobic comments.”Russian dissident politician Aleksei Navalny, who was almost killed in a nerve agent attack last year, has been stripped of his “prisoner of conscience” status by Amnesty International after 15-year-old racist comments were brought to light.Yes, really.Navalny is currently serving a prison sentence which many assert is punishment for him exposing the corruption of the Russian elite and organizing anti-Vladimir Putin demonstrations.In August 2020, Navalny was hospitalized after being poisoned with a nerve agent, an attack he blamed on Putin and agents of the Federal Security Service (FSB).But none of that matters now because Navalny said some mean words 15 years ago.Despite admitting that the complaints made against Navalny were part of an orchestrated campaign to discredit him, Amnesty International announced that they were stripping Navalny of the “prisoner of conscience” designation anyway.“We had too many requests; we couldn’t ignore them,” Amnesty spokesman Alexander Artemev told the BBC, despite noting that the issue was “not relevant” in the light of his current political persecution.“He cannot be a prisoner of conscience: that is someone who never advocates hate or violence or uses hate speech,” Amnesty International added.Navalny allegedly called for the removal of “everything that bothers us” while referring to immigrants and labeled them “cockroaches,” making him a “white supremacist” according to the complaints.Apparently, being caught uttering racist statements a decade and a half ago means many on the left will now abandon Navalny and leave him to rot in a Russian jail.Despite Navalny taking on what many assert to be one of the most dangerously dictatorial regimes in the world, the fact that the Russian dissident allowed some offensive sounds to emerge from his mouth 15 years ago has now sealed his fate.
Read Anglin!


https://dailystormer.su/amnesty-downgrades-prisoner-of-conscience-status-of-alexi-navalny-because-hes-a-neo-nazi/


Andrew Anglin
February 25, 2021

This is the funniest thing that’s happened in several hours.

Basically, we live in a world of such abject nonsense, that it is an extreme chore to just try to explain what’s going on, on the most basic level of events.

Let me just try to bullet point this out.

• The Western system is based on female and anal dominance of society. However, Russia is a hard place to promote feminism and man-on-man anal sex. They just generally are not that into either.

• Alexi Navalny began in the 2000s as a third rate neo-Nazi leader. Not even a Richard Spencer, but basically a handsome, non-obese version of Matt Heimbach.

• Navalny opposed Vladimir Putin on the basis of there being too many Chechens, Dagistanis, Uzbeks and Kazakhs in Moscow.

• At some point, Navalny linked up with Western intelligence to serve as official opposition to Putin. I assume the Mossad and the CIA were involved, but we now have been given literal video evidence of Navalny’s right-hand man soliciting money from British intelligence.

• These intelligence groups don’t care what he believes, because the goal is to overthrow Putin. Once Putin is overthrown, there will be total chaos, and they can insert whatever kind of regime they want, using already established influence networks. (We saw this in the Ukraine, where the neo-Nazis led the 2014 revolution, then as if by magic, the revolutionary government was all Jews, promoting feminism and homosexualism.)

• Navalny was not a very popular opposition figure. The best analog would be that Juan Guaidio guy in Venezuela. He’s got all this Western intelligence backing, an entire established network supporting him, but he just doesn’t have much charisma. That is always going to be the problem when you’re using shills, who don’t really care about whatever it is they’re supposed to be promoting – they’re not strong characters, and they’re not passionate.

• Alexi Navalny was also not well-known internationally, and it is useful to have the masses of Western countries supporting a shill.

• Navalny was then poisoned in some kind of staged event by Western intelligence. The official story is that Putin ordered someone to put a chemical weapon in his tea, with the plan to kill him, but they got the dose wrong. (I’ve gone through why this is retarded many times, but just briefly: 1.) Putin had no reason to kill him – if you are an open society, and you are considered an enemy of the US, you’re going to have an active opposition movement attempting to overthrow the government. It is ideal to have an inept opposition, which is what Navalny was. 2.) Russia is still a violent country, and Navalny was involved in organized crime. He easily could have just been shot on the street, and there would have been full plausible deniability from the Kremlin. 3.) It would really be a major bungle to not use enough chemical weapons to poison someone. In fact, the opposite would be true – you’d have to use intense calculations to use a dose that wouldn’t kill someone.)

• Navalny was flown to Germany, and became a global cause celebré as the democracy-loving victim of the evil dictatorial Putin government. He was 100% presented as a “democracy fighter.” In a very few publications, for the few intellectuals who were actually following internal Russian politics, it was admitted that he had “ethnonationalist tendencies,” but it was claimed that he was “evolving.” (It is certain that if the average Western leftist were to put Putin’s politics next to Navalny’s, outside of this situation, they would choose Putin’s politics. Some people might also feel uncomfortable realizing that this media event is completely staged, like a Hollywood production.)

• Navalny’s recovery from the poisoning in Germany was a heavily intensive spectacle widely, almost obsessively, covered by the Western media. Every article and CNN bit about him said that he was fighting for democracy and was poisoned by an evil dictator.

• Navalny made a return to Russia, knowing that he’d be imprisoned, in order to become a martyr for the discontents to rally around (these are: neo-Nazis, homosexuals and women, as well as general “soy” type people that have been nurtured on Western social media and via Hollywood).

• Russia is now in the midst of a full-on color revolution, the figurehead of which is a neo-Nazi, and the Western media continues to refuse to report the details.


Amnesty International coming out and saying he is no longer a prisoner of conscience because he’s a neo-Nazi obviously won’t be reported on by the mainstream Western media, as they are forming this entire fake narrative about what is going on in Russia.

Nonetheless, the statement is funny on a number of levels. Firstly, if neo-Nazism is his conscience, then why isn’t he a prisoner of conscience? I don’t think he actually is a political prisoner at all, given that he’s an actual criminal who pled guilty to multiple embezzlement and fraud schemes, but if Amnesty is saying he’s locked up for his beliefs, then what does it matter what his beliefs are?

Apparently, they are saying it is impossible for someone with right-wing views to be a prisoner of conscience. Is this because right-wing views are “unconscionable”? Or because right-wingers don’t have consciences?

It’s a very silly thing. I actually giggled when I saw it.
--
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
Loading...