Percentages are gay.
I mean, what's the point? Nadal could lose to some top claycourters perhaps his rivals or some future FO champions, but he could play for 4 more years and lose 4 times.
He'd then have worse FO stats than Borg.
Surely you're not saying Borg would be ahead?
Secondly it's retarded to create such stupid "pressure" situation that a player must win all slams in short time-span. Stupid path.
Imo Serena's "problem" is primarily lack of CYGS. She should have got it, considering she played without a major rival for the most part of her career. I mean I can downgrade Graf due to stabbing, not her fault but she profited off of it, however she did win CYGS before Seles was a major force. Serena didn't.
It means all the goat contenders have have some all-time claims, records to their name, Court, Evert, Navratilova, Graf, Moody.
Bizarrely Serena, even though she'll always be part of tier 1, so far has none, she lacks major all-time records next to her name. We spoke about it.
So in order to make her undisputed goat, her fans are forced to create some fantasy scenarios. Saying CYGS totally not important, and insist on strict split between amateur and open era in female tennis. Ok.
----Android NewsGroup Reader----