Post by TTPost by Kalevi KolttonenPost by TTHe referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he
called him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few
seconds later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
Frankly I think you guys are magnifying his foibles to confirm your
preconceived notions about Biden's state. For sure he wasn't
perfect, but overall I'd say it was average to above average.
He
was clearly comprehending the questions and giving meaningful,
contextual responses. It was no disaster and it certainly
doesn't
spell the end of his political career.
Meaningful contextual responses?
Biden was answering hardly half of the questions with relevant
replies. He was mostly doing his retirement home shtick where he
goes
constantly off-topic, mumbles so that it's hard understand what
he
says. I feel like he's incapable of mouthing words correctly,
sort of
like a handicapped person... unless he shouts.
There was this weird shouting episode too, where he suddenly
started
shouting about great America, children being shot etc. Not sure if it
was in any form related to the question asked, or his answer
even.
Maybe I need to watch the entire thing and not only last 20
minutes... but what I saw looked really bad to me. He finished
multiple times his answer with "well, anyway" when he lost his
train
of thought... he also did same thing in the debate and I think
the
interview afterwards.
One must have truly lowered expectations if this convinced you
of his
cognitive ability & ability to lead a country.
I'd go as far as to say that he is currently incapable of doing
his
job and has not been leading the country for some time.
I doubt he'd pass a cognitive test with flying colours &
definitely
would not get over 100 on an IQ test... probably 60-70 at the
moment?
Can anyone image Tommi Tenderloins freezing up like a deer in
the
headlines on the first question? I sure can.
Biden has been doing this for decades.
You sound like Pelle, and that's not a compliment.
You're one of the most dichotomous thinkers in rst, so what I'm
about to say probably won't make any sense to you. I recognize
and have stated previously that Biden's presentation was not
perfect, his performance was maybe average to above average.
Still, there is no way a person in the throes of dementia could
listen, comprehend and answer the way that he did. He *did*
respond with some substance, enough at least for the masses who
don't have a grasp of the underlying issues. And he did credibly
try to answer the questions as stated. How often do you hear
politicians simply ignore the question and answer what they *want*
to answer? They VERY often do that when they either don't know,
don't understand the question, or feel like they have something to
hide. He didn't do that, in my opinion.
So, even though his presentation itself wasn't great, I think he
at least showed he's capable of comprehending the issues and
making sound decisions and leading, at least from a foreign policy
perspective. I can't help but imagine how Trump would respond to
the same set of questions... you know, the guy that admittedly
only heard of NATO after he became president.
Unless and until there is another credible candidate on the dem
side this is about Biden vs. Trump, and on the things that matter
I still think that Biden is the superior choice. His performance
at least told me he's good enough, and as I've said he has a team
to fall back on... most of what you see during the campaign today
is theatrics anyway and has no relationship to the job itself.
It's almost like a symphony musician playing an audition. They
can be simply wonderful (or terrible) at playing solos in front of
the judges, it has almost no bearing on how well they will perform
day-to-day in the orchestra along with other musicians playing the
same sheet of music. Yet that's how they're judged and that's how
they get the job. The audition is an illusion.